Back
| Date of survey | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 0.7% | 11.2% | 17.5% | 29.8% | 15.6% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 0.7% | 25.6% | 21.2% | 17.2% | 4.2% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
| 7-8/3/2001 | 1.7% | 43.7% | 22.8% | 11.6% | 2.2% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
| 8/3/2000 | 5.3% | 54.7% | 16.4% | 7.4% | 1.2% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
| 18/2/1998 | 3.4% | 38.4% | 20.6% | 11.6% | 1.1% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
| Date of survey | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 11.9% | 17.5% | 45.3% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 26.4% | 21.2% | 21.4% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
| 7-8/3/2001 | 45.4% | 22.8% | 13.9% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
| 8/3/2000 | 59.9% | 16.4% | 8.7% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
| 18/2/1998 | 41.8% | 20.6% | 12.7% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
| Date of survey | Sub-sample base | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 495* | 1.4% | 18.5% | 23.2% | 35.1% | 14.5% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 539* | 3.4% | 43.8% | 22.9% | 13.8% | 3.6% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
| 7-8/3/2001 | 263* | 3.4% | 53.6% | 24.7% | 11.9% | 1.0% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
| 8/3/2000 | 739* | 7.9% | 62.4% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 0.6% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
| 3/3/1999 | 598* | 2.0% | 43.8% | 27.1% | 8.5% | 1.5% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
| 18/2/1998 | 638* | 4.2% | 50.5% | 19.5% | 6.9% | 0.5% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
| Date of survey | Sub-sample base | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 495* | 19.9% | 23.2% | 49.6% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 539* | 47.2% | 22.9% | 17.4% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
| 7-8/3/2001 | 263* | 57.0% | 24.7% | 12.8% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
| 8/3/2000 | 739* | 70.3% | 11.8% | 4.0% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
| 3/3/1999 | 598* | 45.8% | 27.1% | 10.0% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
| 18/2/1998 | 638* | 54.7% | 19.5% | 7.4% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Excluding those who had not heard of the Budget
|
The Financial Secretary said that it could be both the worst and the best of times for Hong Kong's economy at present. Do you agree with what he said? |
| Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 18.4% | 64.8% | 16.8% | 100.0% |
|
The Financial Secretary said that he would keep his target set last year, which was to achieve consolidated and operating balances by 2006/07. Do you think the government can achieve this? (2003) |
| Date of Survey | Yes | No | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 16.8% | 62.3% | 20.9% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 30.7% | 38.4% | 30.9% | 100.0% |
|
The key measures for "raising revenue" proposed by the Financial Secretary included increasing the standard rate of tax by 1 percentage point to 16%, increasing the profits tax rate by 1.5 percentage points to 17.5%, and increasing the property tax rate by 1 percentage point to 16%, all implemented in different phases. Other suggested measures were to raise the Air Passenger Departure Tax from $80 to $120, and to stop freezing government fees and charges. Overall speaking, do you agree to these "revenue-raising" measures? |
| Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 42.0% | 41.7% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
|
The key measures for "cutting expenditure" proposed by the Financial Secretary included reducing the establishment of the civil service by 10%, reducing the social security payment by 11%, and a 6% pay-cut for civil servants implemented in different phases. Overall speaking, do you agree to these "expenditure-cutting" measures? |
| Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 55.7% | 31.3% | 12.9% | 100.0% |
|
The Financial Secretary said that it would be necessary to raise additional revenue of $20 billion in the coming 4 years, but only measures to raise $14 billion were presented this year. Are you confident that the government would be able to handle the "revenue-raising" tasks for the remaining $6 billion properly? |
| Date of Survey | Yes | No | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 21.6% | 59.2% | 19.2% | 100.0% |
|
Overall speaking, do you think the tax system in Hong Kong is fair or unfair? |
| Date of Survey | Very fair | Quite fair | Quite unfair | Very unfair | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 6.1% | 44.5% | 19.4% | 14.0% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 6.3% | 48.7% | 20.8% | 7.9% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
| Date of Survey | Fair | Unfair | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 50.6% | 33.4% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 55.0% | 28.7% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
|
Then, do you think the distribution of wealth in Hong Kong is reasonable or unreasonable? |
| Date of Survey | Very reasonable | Quite reasonable | Quite unreasonable | Very unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 1.5% | 17.1% | 28.1% | 32.0% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 1.4% | 23.9% | 28.5% | 23.3% | 22.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
| Date of Survey | Reasonable | Unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
| 5/3/2003 | 18.6% | 60.1% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
| 6/3/2002 | 25.3% | 51.8% | 22.9% | 100.0% |